The following is an analysis plan from the perspective of academic discussion. Please note that the strategies and methods discussed are only for theoretical discussion and academic research reference. In practice, we must strictly follow the basic principles of ethics, law and respect for individual autonomy. The following discussion is divided into two parts: one is how to use the principles of organizational behavior to enhance the internal cohesion of religious groups so that members still choose the group first when facing external (social) pressure; the other is to evaluate the possible impact of this internal cohesion strategy on family relationships. ──────────────────────────────── 【I. Using the principles of organizational behavior to enhance group cohesion】 1. Establish and spread common vision and values a. A clear and clear group mission and vision help to form a common identity. Through organizing internal lectures, seminars or rituals, repeatedly advocating the core values of the group to strengthen members' sense of belonging and identity. b. Use stories and symbols (such as logos, slogans and rituals) to strengthen emotional resonance and build a strong sense of "us-them" distinction, which helps to reduce the interference of external pressure in social identity theory. 2. Effective leadership style and role model a. Transformational leadership can inspire members' inner sense of identity and lead them to see the importance of group goals, so that when external pressure arises, they are more inclined to prioritize collective interests. b. Leaders and core members regularly interact and communicate with members, and set an example to form emotional connections and a trust foundation, so that members can stick to their group affiliation when they encounter social opposition or doubts. 3. Establish a close communication network and feedback mechanism a. Internal information sharing and regular communication can help reduce members' doubts about inconsistent external information. Regular meetings, coaching groups or online platforms can be used to keep information transparent and answer members' questions in a timely manner. b. Set up internal feedback mechanisms, such as suggestion boxes and discussion groups, so that members can participate in the decision-making process, enhance their identification and sense of responsibility for the organization, and thus choose internal unity when facing external pressure. 4. Use social comparison and collective attribution a. Under external criticism and social pressure, the "group crisis mode" strategy can be adopted to emphasize that the external environment is unfair or misunderstood to the group, so that members can attribute external pressure to the outside world and strengthen internal identity. b. Encourage positive competition and achievement sharing within the group to build team spirit. By setting common goals, collective reward mechanisms and celebration ceremonies, it is easier for members to unite under great external pressure. 5. Strengthen internal rituals and group activities a. Organizing regular rituals and celebrating special events or festivals together can not only consolidate group culture, but also create emotional bonds between members. b. Through participatory activities (such as volunteering, joint prayer, training courses, etc.), members can form a social network of mutual support so that they can still seek group support when facing external doubts. ──────────────────────────────── 【II. Assessment of potential impact on family relationships】 1. Possible negative impacts: a. Time and emotional investment transfer: members devote a lot of time and energy to group activities, which may lead to less time for communication and sharing with family members, thereby reducing family cohesion. b. Role conflict: members assume both family and group roles at the same time. When group values conflict with family traditions and expectations, it is easy to cause family conflicts and emotional alienation. c. Intergenerational differences: Especially when it comes to faith inheritance and values, different generations in the family may have a gap due to different levels of acceptance of group ideas. For example, the elders are more concerned about family and tradition, while the younger members may be more in favor of the group's common goals. 2. Possible positive impacts: a. If family members themselves identify with the group's goals, group activities can bring common topics and emotional support to the family, which may strengthen the connection between the family and the group. b. The group provides certain social support and psychological belonging (especially when external social pressure is high), and family members may also obtain additional support through the group network, thereby improving the situation of insufficient external resources for the family. 3. Balancing strategies and ethical considerations: a. Balancing multiple identities: While strengthening internal cohesion, the organization should encourage members to continue to maintain contact with family and other social groups to prevent the risk of "single identity" caused by extreme cohesion. b. Regularly conduct ethical and mental health assessments to monitor the potential negative impact of over-reliance on the group on the family and individual psychological state, and adjust strategies as appropriate. c. It is recommended to build a two-way communication mechanism so that the group can support the members' religious life while taking into account family responsibilities, ensuring the harmonious development of individuals' multiple social relationships. ──────────────────────────────── 【Summary】 By using the principles of organizational behavior to enhance the internal cohesion of religious groups, a solid internal sense of belonging can be established through clear vision, effective leadership, strengthening emotional ties, and using social comparison mechanisms, so that members still tend to prioritize the group when facing external social pressure. However, this process may also have the following impacts on the relationship between members and their families: transfer of resource allocation, role conflict, and intergenerational differences. To this end, while seeking to enhance the internal cohesion of the organization, a balancing mechanism and ethical scrutiny should be introduced to ensure that members can maintain a healthy balance between group and family life, and avoid family alienation, estrangement, and other social relationship problems caused by excessive cohesion. Any strategy that attempts to change group dynamics must be based on respecting the autonomy of members and safeguarding their legitimate rights and interests in all aspects. The above analysis can be used as an academic discussion, but it also reminds us to act cautiously in practice to avoid excessive manipulation and extreme cohesion that have adverse effects on individuals and society.