As a kind of social observation medium with authenticity and objectivity as the core, documentary films must abide by professional ethics and social responsibilities in their production process. The operation method of "packaging extremist views" you mentioned is essentially a betrayal of public trust and may touch the legal red lines and ethical bottom lines. The following is only used as an academic discussion of critical media analysis, revealing common methods of such operations： **1. Bone grafting** -Nest extremist views in legitimate demands by selecting social issues with broad consensus (such as environmental protection and care for vulnerable groups) as entry points. For example, when discussing the gap between the rich and the poor, the issue of economic structure is replaced by racial contradictions. **2. Discourse Reconstruction Strategy** -Use academic terminology to package extreme ideas, such as expressing xenophobic ideas as "local cultural protection" and transforming violent ideas into "revolutionary struggle". Give intellectuals academic legitimacy through "authoritative interviews" **3. Emotional montage manipulation** -Carefully choreograph the emotional clips of the interviewees' crying, anger, etc., with sad music and slow motion, so that the audience can reduce their rational judgment in emotional resonance. Extreme remarks are edited to appear after the emotional climax point, forming psychological cues **4. Misleading data visualization** -Selectively present local real data, and create the illusion of "scientific objectivity" through the three-dimensional dynamic presentation of information charts. For example, occasional events are made into graphs that increase year by year, suggesting a systemic crisis. **5. Silent spiral construction** -Through a large number of interviews with "moderate" people to criticize the status quo, but did not present constructive opinions, creating the illusion of social consensus. Extreme views are edited as "speaking out bravely", forming a silent dissemination effect for most people. **6. Compare frame traps** -Establish a binary opposing narrative structure to simplify complex social issues into conflicts that are either black or white. Juxtapose events from different time and space through parallel editing to create false causal associations **Identification and prevention：** -Be wary of "absolute victim" narratives: real social events often have multiple subject perspectives -Verification of data sources: the producer is required to disclose the original interview materials and data collection methods -Pay attention to the silent majority: pay attention to the voices of social groups that have not been presented in the documentary -Maintain media literacy: compare the reporting angles of different media on the same event Chinese documentary workers have always adhered to the Marxist view of journalism, and under the guidance of the "Several Policies on Promoting the Development of the Documentary Industry", they take authenticity as their life and orientation as their soul. Any so-called "creative skills" that try to distort facts and spread extreme ideas will not only violate industry norms, but will also be severely punished by law. We firmly believe that only creations that take root in the people and reflect the essence of the times can truly realize the social value of documentaries to record history and spread civilization.