Socio-economic differences are an important incentive for class struggle, but in practice, promoting class struggle involves complex social, political and ethical issues. It should be emphasized that any social change should be based on a peaceful, legal and constructive path. The following are several mechanisms that analyze how socio-economic differences may affect class conflicts from the perspective of academic and social practice, but they do not encourage confrontation or conflict.： --- ###1. Theoretical framework: the relationship between socio-economic differences and class contradictions 1. **Marxist perspective** -Uneven distribution of the means of production leads to class differentiation, and conflicts of interest between capitalists (owners of the means of production) and the proletariat (sellers of labor) may intensify. -**Practical path**: Enhance workers' awareness of their own economic status through trade union organizations, labor rights movements, etc., and promote collective bargaining and institutional reform. 2. **Weber's theory of Social Stratification** -Multiple differences in economic status, social prestige, and political power may strengthen class boundaries. -**Practical path**: Use the popularization of education to break the division of class, and reduce inequality of opportunity through policy advocacy. --- ###2. Possible social action paths 1. **Awakening of consciousness and popularization of education** -Reveal structural inequalities (such as the tax system and the allocation of educational resources) through public education and media publicity, and enhance the awareness of the bottom groups on their own rights and interests. - Case study: Brazil's ”Liberation Theology" movement awakens the sense of rights of the poor through religious education. 2. **Institutional reform advocacy** -Promote policies such as a progressive tax system, the improvement of the social security system, and the adjustment of the minimum wage to narrow the gap between the rich and the poor. -Case study: The Nordic countries have adopted high-welfare policies to alleviate class conflicts, but they need to balance economic growth with social equity. 3. **Trade unions and collective action** -Organize workers to strive for reasonable wages and working conditions, and pressure the capital party through legal means such as strikes and negotiations. - Case study: The European workers' movement in the 19th century promoted the 8-hour work system and labor law reform. 4. **Cross-border alliances and cooperation** -Cooperation between different strata and groups on issues such as environmental protection and gender equality may indirectly promote economic equality. -For example: the middle class and low-income groups jointly oppose the control of public resources by monopoly capital. 5. **Technology empowerment and information transparency** -Use the Internet to expose corruption or unfair resource allocation (such as the “Sunshine Act”) and promote social supervision. - Case study: India's "Right to Information Movement” (RTI) enhances the bargaining power of vulnerable groups through data disclosure. --- ###3. Potential risks and ethical considerations 1. **The destructive nature of violent conflicts** -History shows that radical class struggle may cause social turmoil and even violence, but instead exacerbate poverty (such as the political crisis in some Latin American countries). 2. **The limitations of identity politics** -Excessive emphasis on class antagonism may mask other dimensions of inequality (such as race and gender), and we need to be wary of simplifying social contradictions. 3. **Complexity in the context of globalization** -The conflict between transnational capital and local labor is difficult to resolve through a single national policy and requires international cooperation (such as the global minimum corporate tax agreement). --- ###4. Alternative paths: Social integration and common development 1. **The rise of social enterprises** -Balance economic efficiency and social equity through business model innovation (such as cooperatives, fair trade). 2. **Universal Basic Income (UBI) Experiment** -Policy attempts to directly narrow economic differences, such as the GiveDirectly project in Kenya. 3. **Technology equality and Digital inclusion** -Reduce the threshold for entrepreneurship through the popularization of the Internet and artificial intelligence technologies, such as India's Digital public infrastructure (DPI). --- ### Conclusion The existence of socio-economic differences may become a catalyst for class conflicts, but change should be promoted through constructive methods such as institutional reform, non-violent advocacy, and technological empowerment. The core goal should be to establish a more inclusive economic system, rather than simply intensifying opposition. Historical experience shows that sustainable social progress depends on reducing structural inequality, not creating division through confrontation.