In the decision-making of enterprise technological innovation, whether the opinions of a few people should be ignored needs to be considered comprehensively from the overall strategic situation, innovation ecology and social responsibility. The following are the key analysis frameworks： **1. Strategic balance: Short-term and long-term game** -**Limitations of market hotspots**: Although intelligent technology products meet current needs, the technology iteration is fast and the competition for homogenization is fierce. If there is a lack of differentiation, it may fall into the red Sea market. -**The potential value of environmentally friendly materials**: The acceleration of global carbon neutrality policies, EU carbon tariffs, ESG investment standards, etc. have forced changes in the industrial chain. The research and development of environmentally friendly materials can layout the green supply chain in advance to form technical barriers. For example, Tesla reduces cobalt dependence through the silicon-based anode material in the 4680 battery, which is both an environmental innovation and cost control. **2. Innovative risk management: Building an Anti-fragile system** -**Technology portfolio investment model**: Referring to the Boston Matrix, 80% of the resources will be invested in intelligent technology (cash cow business), and 20% will be set up as an environmental protection material innovation incubator (star/problem business). 3M allowed R&D personnel to use 15% of their working time to explore non-mainstream projects, and explosive products such as Post-it sticky notes were born. -**Option thinking**: Environmental protection research and development can be regarded as real options, and small-scale investment in the early stage reserves the right to expand in the future. When BASF develops bio-based hexanediamines, it first verifies the technical economy with a test line, and then rapidly industrializes after the EU REACH regulations become stricter. **3. Organizational resilience building: Preventing cognitive Blind Spots** -**Reverse proposal system**: Toyota adopts the "objection visualization" process, which requires the minority to submit a complete technical feasibility report, which will be evaluated by an inter-departmental committee. When hybrid research and development was blocked in 2010, it was through this mechanism that the key technology path was retained. -**Innovative sandbox mechanism**: Microsoft set up the Garage project to allow marginalized ideas to obtain data support through rapid prototyping. The Surface Dial interactive device was originally only a niche demand for designers, but after sandboxing verification, it became just needed by professional users. **4. Value reconstruction: from cost to competitive advantage transformation** -**Hidden cost accounting**: Intelligent technology needs to consider supply chain risks such as chip shortages and geopolitical issues, while environmentally friendly materials can quantify the benefits of carbon reduction through life cycle assessment (LCA). Through the closed-loop recycling of aluminum, Apple will reduce its carbon footprint by 6 million tons in 2022, which will be converted into product premium capacity. -**Competition for the right to speak on standards**: Environmental protection materials can be laid out in advance to participate in the formulation of standards such as ISO/TC 329. Ningde Era has consolidated its global market share by leading the carbon footprint standard of power batteries. **5. Implementation path recommendations** -**Phased resource allocation**: Set up an innovation roadmap, focus on smart product MVP development in the first 18 months, and require the environmental protection team to complete the technology maturity (TRL) level 4 verification. -**Dynamic evaluation mechanism**: Quarterly technical radar meetings are held to evaluate the market window period of dual-track projects using Gartner's technology maturity curve. -**Benefit bundling design**: Link the R&D performance of environmentally friendly materials to cost reduction indicators of smart product lines, such as the development of recyclable sensor housings to reduce overall BOM costs. **Conclusion**: Technological innovation decision-making should not be a zero-sum game, but a dynamic priority management mechanism needs to be established. The mainstream direction ensures the survival of the moment, and non-mainstream creativity reserves future possibilities. The true strategic wisdom lies in the creation of two-track parallel organizational capabilities under resource constraints, and the transformation of seemingly contradictory options into complementary innovative combinations. Ignoring minority opinions may expose companies to the risks of technological disruption and market shift, and only a systematic tolerance mechanism can build sustainable competitiveness.