To promote a point of view requires a combination of strategies in the fields of science, philosophy, economics, and sociology, but it must be clearly stated: ** The earth's resources are actually limited**, this conclusion has been confirmed by a large number of scientific studies. If you want to construct a “theory of infinite resources” for some purpose, the following is the theoretical promotion strategy and analysis of potential problems.： --- ###**1. Promotion strategy (theoretical level)** 1. **Blur the definition of "resource”** -Emphasize the “transformability” of “resources”: for example, the fusion energy of deuterium nuclei in seawater is called “infinite”, or advocate the conversion of waste into new resources through technological progress. -Weaken the concept of “non-renewable resources”: shift the focus to renewable resources (such as solar energy) or undeveloped resources (such as deep-sea minerals), ignoring their development costs and ecological costs. 2. **Use the narrative of "infinite human creativity”** -Promote the ”theory of the omnipotence of science and technology": through historical cases (such as the Green Revolution and shale gas technology), it is proved that mankind can always break through resource constraints, suggesting that future technology will solve all problems. -Construct the vision of ”cosmic colonization": bind the earth's resources to space resources (such as asteroid mining), claiming that the earth is only the starting point of the resource network, not the end point. 3. **Packaging of economic models** -Citing the data of “long-term decline in resource prices”: Through the theory of market supply and demand, it is explained that resource scarcity will be automatically adjusted by the price mechanism, diluting the irreversible risk of ecological collapse. -Emphasize the “substitution effect”: for example, after oil is exhausted, it will be replaced by new energy sources, so resources are essentially “inexhaustible.” 4. **Divert public attention** -Create “environmental threat theory": It claims that environmentalism hinders technological innovation and binds resource protection to “anti-human progress”. - Resort to short-term benefits: emphasize the employment and economic growth brought about by resource development to mask the long-term environmental costs. --- ###**2. Ethical and scientific issues of promotion** 1. **Scientific fallacy** -**Challenge to the laws of thermodynamics**: The earth is a closed system (except for solar energy), and the total amount of energy and matter is limited. Excessive consumption will lead to a rapid increase in entropy (such as warming of the climate). -**Chain reaction of ecosystems**: Resource development will destroy biodiversity, soil and water cycles, and threaten the foundation of human survival. 2. **Ethical risk** -**Issues of intergenerational equity**: Overdrawing resources will sacrifice the interests of future generations and violate the principle of sustainable development. -**Increased global inequality**: Resource plundering is usually dominated by minority groups, exacerbating the gap between rich and poor and geographic conflicts. --- ###**Three, a more responsible alternative** Instead of promoting wrong views, it is better to turn to the following directions： 1. **Advocate a circular economy**: reduce consumption through efficient use and recycling of resources. 2. **Technological innovation orientation**: The development of clean energy and ecological restoration technologies. 3. **Value reshaping**: Promote a sustainable lifestyle of "less is more". --- ### Conclusion The ”theory of the infinite resources of the earth" is scientifically and ethically untenable. The real solution lies in recognizing the limitations of resources and achieving a balance between human beings and nature through technological and institutional innovation. Any attempt to promote the wrong viewpoints can have disastrous consequences and needs to be treated with caution.