The question of whether certain beliefs are destined to fail to integrate into modern society needs to be analyzed dialectically from multiple dimensions and cannot be generalized. The following is a combing of this complex issue： ###1. The core criteria for judging "unable to integrate" 1. **Legal and ethical bottom line**: If faith advocates violence, discrimination, or anti-human behavior (such as extremism), it will inevitably conflict with the modern society under the rule of law. 2. **Scientific cognitive system**: Denying beliefs in basic scientific consensus (such as vaccine principles, climate change), and facing survival dilemmas in technological civilization. 3. **The principle of equal rights**: The belief in hierarchical oppression (such as the caste system) and gender discrimination has a fundamental contradiction with the concept of universal human rights. ###2. The possibility path of dynamic fusion 1. **Reinterpretation of doctrine**： -Christian libertarians reinterpret the Bible and support LGBTQ+ equality -The combination of Buddhist meditation and modern psychotherapy -Islamic financial reform is in line with modern economic rules 2. **Functional transformation**： -Japanese Shintoism has shifted from national sacrifice to cultural inheritance -Globalization of Hindu yoga as a healthy lifestyle -The transformation of Confucianism into business management wisdom 3. **Social compromise mechanism**： -The Amish community and the U.S. government reached an education exemption agreement -Saudi Arabia gradually opens up women's right to drive -Establishment of a modern college system in Tibetan Buddhist monasteries ###3. Cases of deep contradictions that are difficult to reconcile 1. **Structural conflicts**： -Human sacrifice traditions of certain tribal beliefs -Extreme religious groups that refuse medical treatment -Resistance of anti-intellectualist sects to basic education 2. **Differences in civilization paradigm**： -Nomadic Shamanic beliefs and urbanization process -The conflict between animism and the concept of intellectual property rights -The opposition between ancestor worship and individualist values ###4. The limits of tolerance in modern society 1. **The Paradox of Tolerance**: A free society cannot tolerate beliefs that deny the principle of tolerance 2. **Intergenerational differences**: Younger generations reconstruct traditions through selective inheritance 3. **Technological impact**: The development of meta-universe and AI is reshaping the existence scene of all beliefs ###5. Historical Inspiration and future prospects 1. Success story: Judaism has gone through the diasporas to maintain its core values while modernizing 2. Lesson from Failure: Zoroastrianism is almost extinct due to the failure of rigid reform 3. Emerging trends: the rise of mixed beliefs such as ecological spirituality and technological humanism **Conclusion**: The survival of faith depends on whether its core values are "translatable" and whether it can develop a grammar for dialogue with modern society while maintaining its identity. Those beliefs that adhere to the characteristics of anti-civilization will eventually be marginalized, while beliefs with ethical universality and cultural flexibility will continue their vitality in innovation. Modernity itself is also being redefined by different beliefs, which is a process of two-way adaptation.