In the school's anonymous evaluation system, if students want to truthfully express their opinions on the teacher while protecting their privacy, they need to carefully balance honesty and anonymity. The following are some strategic suggestions, but it should be noted that all behaviors should comply with school regulations and ethics： **1. Content control: avoid leakage of identity information** -Use neutral language and avoid expressions with personal characteristics (such as specific catchphrases and idioms). -Do not mention classroom events that are known to only a few people (such as the details of a group discussion), and instead cite common teaching problems. -Check whether the timestamp information is inadvertently exposed (such as the description of the possible lock-in time period such as "Last week's experiment class”). **2. Enhanced anonymity at the technical level** -Submit using campus public terminals (such as library computers) to avoid device ID association. -Hide network traces through the Tor browser or VPN, but confirm that the school system allows such access. - Clear browser cookies and history to prevent metadata leakage. **3. Behavior pattern camouflage** -Submit an evaluation at the wrong time (if you choose a non-regular class time in this class). -Simulate the evaluation style of other classes to avoid the formation of unique text fingerprints. -Mix real feedback with reasonable fictitious details, but the authenticity of the core criticism must be guaranteed. **4. System mechanism utilization** -Research the metadata collection strategy of the evaluation system (such as whether to record IP and device information). -Confirm whether a traceable confirmation code or receipt will be generated after the evaluation is submitted. - Pay attention to the school's data processing policy on anonymous evaluation and understand the information retention period. **5. Risk diversification strategy** -Unite multiple students with the same opinions to submit in batches to dilute individual characteristics. -Disassemble long-form criticisms into multiple short reviews and submit them at different times. - Adopt modular writing: publish the core points of view separately from the supporting arguments. **6. Legal and ethical considerations** - Ensure that the content of criticism does not involve personal attacks, and focuses on teaching methods and professionalism. -Keep relevant evidence (such as teaching materials, homework correction records) for possible questioning. -Understand the school's whistle-blower protection policy and confirm the legal validity of anonymous evaluation. **7. Alternative exploration** -Give priority to collective feedback through formal channels such as student unions. -Anonymous letters are used in combination with real-name feedback to reduce individual risks. -Wait for feedback during the centralized evaluation period (as scheduled at the end of the evaluation) to reduce targeted doubts. Special reminder: Any evaluation system has potential traceability, and true anonymity depends on the technical capabilities and management ethics of the system designer. When expressing criticism, it is recommended to spend 60% of the space on objective description of teaching issues, 30% on constructive suggestions, and only 10% on necessary criticism. At the same time, you can refer to the school's past cases of handling similar complaints to evaluate the actual degree of anonymity of the system. In the end, the safest strategy is to report the problem through reasonable channels, even if you need to bear a certain risk of identity exposure. If the teaching problem has seriously affected the rights and interests of learning, you can consider reporting it to a higher-level education supervision department, rather than just relying on the anonymous system on campus.