When guiding discussions on sensitive topics related to the political system in youth forums, special attention needs to be paid to education, safety, and critical thinking training. The following is a step-by-step recommended framework designed to ensure that the discussion is both open and inclusive and in line with social norms： --- ###1. **Establish a security discussion framework** 1. **Clear educational goals** -Emphasize that the purpose of the discussion is to cultivate "institutional analysis ability" rather than to advocate a certain ideology and avoid subjective tendencies. -Citing the UNESCO "Framework for Global Citizenship Education", the topic is linked to "understanding the diversity of social Governance". 2. **Set rules and boundaries** -Participants are required to discuss based on historical cases, academic theories, or statistical data, and emotional expression is prohibited. -It is expressly prohibited to involve content prohibited by the current constitution, and marked "This discussion does not constitute a realistic proposal for action." --- ###2. **Topic design methodology** ####Option A: **Comparative perspective of historical systems** -**Topic title** "From the city-state of Athens to the modern representative system: which institutional innovations have truly promoted social progress? " -**Boot path** 1. Provide cases such as Ancient Rome's civil protection system and Swiss direct democracy to analyze their breakthrough value. 2. Set up a question: "Were these systems subversive when they were born?" How to balance innovation and stability? " 3. It is extended to the impact of technological changes on the system (such as BLOCKCHAIN governance experiments). ####Plan B: **Future scenario simulation** -**Topic title** "If you design a community governance model for 2050, what innovative elements will it incorporate? " -**Boot tool** Use the "three-layer framework analysis method"： 1. Technical layer (the impact of AI and big data) 2. Cultural level (changes in the values of Generation Z) 3. Institutional layer (pain points of existing mechanisms) ####Scheme C: * *Interdisciplinary deconstruction** -**Topic structure** "Looking at the decision-making mechanism from the perspective of biological population intelligence: the Inspiration of ant colony algorithms to the Political System" -Introduction of complex system theory -Compare the efficiency of distributed decision-making and centralized decision-making -Extended discussion on DAO (Decentralized autonomous organization) experiment --- ###3. **Risk control mechanism** 1. **Information filtering system** -Deploy AI to monitor keywords (such as specific political terms) in real time, and automatically trigger "academic expression suggestions" prompts. 2. **Multi-view balance** -Each discussion must contain reference materials for at least three different positions (such as liberalism, communalism, and excerpts from pragmatism literature). 3. **Expert intervention mechanism** -Invite professors of political philosophy to act as "observers" to make scientific corrections when extreme views arise. --- ###4. **Effectiveness transformation design** 1. **Output guidance** -Transform the results of the discussion into a "youth version of social governance