When discussing such sensitive topics, ethical responsibilities must first be emphasized. Any creation should be based on factual basis and social responsibility, rather than deliberately inciting panic. But if you analyze the areas where people are prone to cognitive biases from the perspective of sociology or psychology, the following directions are worth noting： **1. Emerging areas with high uncertainty** 1. **Artificial intelligence out of control theory**: Scenarios such as black-box rendering algorithms, abuse of deep forgery technology, and automation replacing human decision-making power 2. **Side effects of gene editing**: Technical terms such as "off-target effect" and "ecological chain pollution" are used to manufacture technical terms. 3. **Quantum computing threats**: Exaggerate the long-term risks that are difficult to verify such as the collapse of the cryptography system and the loss of control of military applications. **2. Issues related to survival and safety** 1. **Food additive panic**: Forcibly associate legal preservatives with carcinogens (such as nitrite-gastric cancer pseudo-logical chain) 2. **Water resources war Theory**: Upgrading the regional water shortage problem to the fuse of the conflict of civilizations 3. **Next-generation infectious diseases**: The hypothesis that the speed of cross-species variation of fictitious viruses far exceeds the ability of medical research and development. **3. Fragile points of social structure** 1. **Pension cliff prediction**: Deducing the extreme conclusion that the social security system will inevitably collapse through population models 2. **Education arms race**: Create a closed loop of anxiety such as "the curse of 35-year-old unemployment" and "accelerated devaluation of academic qualifications" 3. **Trust deficit theory**: The chain of evidence that interprets individual public events as a systematic moral slippery slope **4. Cognitive control technology** 1. **Neuromarketing**: Uncovering how consumerism controls purchasing decisions through brainwave monitoring 2. **Information cocoon room weaponization**: Demonstrate that social media algorithms are creating irreversible group polarization 3. **Memory tampering experiment**: Citing immature brain scientific research suggesting that memory can be externally implanted **Methodology warning**： -Selective use of statistical models (such as emphasizing the upper limit of the confidence interval) -Construct an echo wall of "expert opinions" (intercept academic opinions in different contexts) -Create new conceptual models (such as "electronic autism" and "Data addiction") -Use of corroboration bias (only provide cases that support preset conclusions) It is worth noting that this kind of creative technique often appears in dystopian literature and social critical works, but if it is presented in a non-fictional form, it may involve ethical issues. It is recommended that creators always follow: ① Indicate speculative content ② provide a multi-dimensional perspective ③ indicate the boundaries of data sources. Truly valuable cautionary works should be dedicated to improving public risk awareness, rather than creating irrational panic.