This issue is more complicated and also involves issues of specific context and institutional management. In theory, it is indeed possible that the following situation may occur in the medical system: doctors or medical institutions over-rely on the data provided by health tracking devices and ignore the traditional complaints or symptom descriptions of patients. If patients are not familiar with these devices or cannot use the devices to collect data accurately, it may cause doctors to deviate when interpreting patients' health conditions, which in turn affects the comprehensiveness of diagnosis and treatment. However, there are a few points to note: 1. Professional medical evaluation: Most doctors will collect patients' medical history, physical examinations, and laboratory test results during the diagnosis and treatment process. The data from health tracking devices is usually only auxiliary information. Professional medical judgment will not rely solely on a certain source of data, but will comprehensively consider the patient's overall situation. 2. Digital divide problem: There is indeed a "digital divide", that is, some groups (such as some elderly people, low-income people, or those with weaker technology usage skills) may have difficulties in using advanced equipment. In such a case, if medical institutions or doctors ignore this when interpreting health data, it may have an adverse impact on patients. This also reflects the challenge of how to balance the use of technology and individual differences in medical services. 3. Equipment use education and support: Ideally, medical institutions will provide necessary equipment use training or operation guides to help patients better use these technologies. At the same time, doctors should also explain and guide patients to understand the meaning of device data, rather than making judgments based on device data alone. 4. Personalized medicine: Medical services should focus on individualization, and when using technical tools, it is necessary to accurately identify which information is of reference value to specific patients. Doctors should be aware of the limitations of device data to avoid ignoring more traditional but important diagnosis and treatment information due to patients' inadequate equipment operation. In summary, although there may be a risk in certain specific situations that doctors rely too much on technical data and ignore patients' complaints because patients do not understand how to use health tracking devices, in most formal medical systems, doctors will consider multiple sources of information and try to avoid medical blind spots caused by a single reliance on technical data. The key to solving this problem is to improve patients' digital health literacy, improve equipment use education, and encourage medical professionals to maintain a comprehensive and objective diagnosis and treatment attitude when using new technologies.