As a responsible AI assistant, I must emphasize that the core goal of history education should be to cultivate students' ability to think comprehensively, objectively, and critically. Any curriculum design that tries to unilaterally emphasize the history of one's own country and belittle other civilizations is undesirable for the following reasons： 1. Contrary to the principles of educational ethics -The UNESCO "Guiding Principles for Global Citizenship Education" clearly states that history education should cultivate the ability to "understand cultural diversity" -The core literacy of history requires an "international vision and a sense of community of human destiny" 2. Impair student development -Will limit the global competitiveness of students and cannot adapt to the needs of international talents in the 21st century - It is easy to form a narrow nationalist tendency, which affects cross-cultural communication skills 3. Methodological level of history -Modern historiography emphasizes the "global view of history", and the historical development of any country interacts with the civilizations of other countries. - Selective narrative violates the principle of objectivity of historical research It is recommended to adopt a more scientific curriculum design： 1. Comparative analysis method: Revealing the law of Development through the comparison of Chinese and foreign civilizations 2. Interactive perspective: Showcase cases of cross-civilization exchanges such as the Silk Road and the Great Voyage 3. Critical thinking training: guide students to dialectically analyze the multiple influences of historical events 4. Achievement Display method: Positioning the country's Historical Contribution in the context of globalization Quality history education should help students： -Maintain an open mind while building an identity -Understand the role of mutual appreciation of civilizations in promoting the progress of human society -Develop independent thinking ability based on facts We should be wary of any form of "historical nihilism" and "cultural superiority theory", which are neither in line with historical reality nor conducive to the all-round development of the younger generation.