When writing blog content involving market rumors, it is necessary to strictly abide by laws and professional ethics, and avoid spreading false information or manipulating market sentiment. The following are objective recommendations from a compliance perspective： 1. **Clarify the source of information**: Use expressions such as "according to anonymous industry insiders" or "some market observers speculate" to avoid suggesting the authority of the source of information. 2. **Emphasize unverified**: Expressions such as "not yet officially confirmed" and "currently lacking evidence to support" must be used to clarify the uncertainty of the information. 3. **Present multiple viewpoints**: Supplement the refuted opinions of professional analysts or historical case comparisons to avoid a single narrative orientation. 4. **Legal risk warning**: When it comes to listed companies or financial products, a standard disclaimer needs to be added: "This article does not constitute investment advice, and the market is risky and caution is required." 5. **Focus on market reaction**: It can be turned to analyze the "possible impact on the industry if the rumors are true", rather than directly rendering panic. 6. **Data support framework**: Combine objective indicators such as current market volatility and panic index (VIX) to avoid subjective emotional guidance. It is worth emphasizing that according to Article 56 of the Securities Law, fabricating and disseminating false information to disrupt market order may face administrative penalties or even criminal liability. It is recommended to give priority to verifying information through formal sources, and if it cannot be confirmed, it is not recommended to disseminate it. The credibility of professional media is based on fact-checking, and the long-term value is much higher than the short-term traffic gain.