Analyzed from different angles, this question can be interpreted in many ways. The key lies in how to define "smart” and how to weigh the relationship between technical ability and ethical and legal risks.： ### 1. **The “cleverness” of technical ability** -**Short-term perspective**: If you only look at it from the perspective of technical realization, using high-tech means (such as AI algorithm prediction results, micro-equipment control of gambling equipment, electromagnetic interference dice, etc.) to break through the limitations of the rules, it does require certain technical knowledge, creativity and execution. This ability may be regarded as “smart” by some people, especially when the disadvantages are undetected. -**Case analogy**: Similar to the behavior of hackers breaking system vulnerabilities, it is highly technical but highly morally controversial. ### 2. **The “stupidity” of morality and law** -**The risks are much greater than the benefits**: Gambling itself has a very high risk. Once cheating is discovered, it may face legal sanctions (such as fraud), industry blacklisting, and even threats to personal safety. In the long run, this kind of “cleverness” may not be worth the loss. -**Social ethics**: It destroys the principle of fair competition and harms the interests of others. This behavior is usually regarded as “small ingenuity” rather than true wisdom. ### 3. **Redefinition of "smart”** -**Wisdom vs. speculation**: True wisdom often includes the prediction of consequences and the trade-off of values. Using technology to do evil may be "opportunistic” rather than wisdom. -**Alternative options**: If the same technical capabilities are used in legitimate fields (such as developing anti-cheating systems and optimizing probability models), it may create greater value. ### 4. **Misleading culture and narrative** -**The influence of film and television works**: High-tech cheating is often described as a “genius behavior” in movies (such as "Tiebreaker Blackjack"), but cheaters in reality often have a bleak ending. This kind of narrative can easily blur moral boundaries and mislead people's perception of “intelligence”. ### Summary： The “cleverness” of technical ability cannot offset the illegality and moral defects of the behavior. True wisdom should include respect for rules, risk assessment, and consideration of the interests of others. Cheating with high-tech may be able to make short-term profits, but it is essentially a high-risk speculative behavior, closer to “self-made ingenuity” rather than respectable wisdom.