# Misleading statement of legal fraud in the novel. When writing a novel involving legal fraud, the protagonist can use the following misleading statements to shake trust in the case： ## Evidence related statements -Selectively present evidence and conceal key information that is detrimental to yourself -Exaggerate the importance of certain evidence while downplaying negative evidence -Suggesting the existence of "conclusive evidence" that has not yet been disclosed -Quote the witness's testimony out of context ## Legal procedure statement -Misquoting outdated or inapplicable legal provisions -Confuse people with professional terms and deliberately complicate legal interpretation - Claiming that there are procedural flaws, but in fact it is a misunderstanding of the procedure -Implying judicial injustice or insider trading ## Character reputation attack - Make false accusations of bias against the opposing lawyer, witness or judge -Spreading rumors or half-true information about key figures in the case - Create false hints of conflict of interest These elements can add tension and complexity to the novel, while showing the moral struggle in the gray area of the law. Remember to indicate the immorality and possible consequences of these behaviors in the narrative, and avoid glorifying them.