Although most people support a project, this does not mean that opposing opinions can be completely ignored. There are several reasons for this: 1. Potential risks and blind spots: Opponents can often point out potential problems or risks that most people ignore. If not taken seriously, these problems may evolve into greater hidden dangers in the future. 2. Diverse perspectives: Different perspectives help to comprehensively evaluate the feasibility and possible consequences of a project. Incorporating different opinions can avoid the fallacy of groupthink and make decisions more prudent and objective. 3. Improve team cohesion: Listening to different opinions can make team members feel that their voices are valued, thereby improving the team's sense of cooperation and trust. 4. Innovation and improvement: Questions raised by opponents can often prompt improvements in the design and implementation of the project, making the project more perfect. Therefore, in the process of project decision-making, whether supporters are in the majority or minority, it is very important to actively listen to, analyze and reasonably integrate opposing opinions. Of course, the final decision also needs to weigh the rationality of the opinions and the actual situation of the project, but ignoring opposing opinions in the early stages may miss important information and opportunities for improvement.