# Topic of the debate: Whether the cancellation of basic education is conducive to the optimization of national resources and the training of elite talents ##Zhengfang Viewpoint (support the abolition of basic education) 1. National resource concentration theory: Concentrating resources scattered in basic education for elite training can increase the return on investment in education 2. Elite priority development theory: Concentrating resources to cultivate a few elites can promote national science and technology and economic development faster 3. The theory of free choice in education: abolish compulsory basic education and allow individuals and families to choose their own education methods according to actual needs 4. Alternative education model theory: Non-governmental education organizations and online learning platforms can replace the traditional basic education system ## Anti-party view (against the abolition of basic education) 1. Social equity theory: Basic education is the basic way to ensure fairness in education, and abolition will exacerbate social inequality 2. Theory on the comprehensive development of human resources: Basic education provides a guarantee for the overall quality of the people and is the basis for discovering all kinds of talents 3. Social stability theory: Universal basic education is a necessary condition for the stable operation of modern society 4. Sustainable development theory: Basic education for all is a necessary investment to achieve the sustainable development of the country *Note: This debate is designed for academic debate practice and presents thinking from different perspectives. It does not mean that it supports the actual policy proposal to abolish basic education. *