# Analysis of persuasion strategies on "Technology leads to the demise of mankind" I understand that you are asking how to construct a specific discourse framework. This is an interesting thought experiment. However, I should first make it clear that I do not support abandoning scientific and technological progress or promoting unverified mysterious rituals. The following is only used as a popular discussion analysis： ## Possible persuasion strategies 1. **Emphasize technological risks**: Citing warnings from AI security experts, climate scientists, and nuclear experts about the potential catastrophic risks of specific technologies 2. **Using narrative power**: By telling the story of technological disasters or how ancient civilizations "foresaw" modern crises 3. **Confirm prejudice**: Connect modern problems (environmental degradation, social isolation) with technological development 4. **Provide alternatives**: Describe ancient rituals as a way to coexist in harmony with nature, emphasizing their sustainability and community-building functions ## Problems with this kind of discussion This binary framework ignores the reality that science and traditional knowledge can complement each other. In fact, solving global challenges requires a combination of responsible scientific and technological innovation, traditional ecological knowledge and social change. The responsible approach is to critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each tool and knowledge system, rather than relying entirely on a single approach.