# About defending customers who have been sued for spreading false news As a legal adviser, I need to point out that the dissemination of false information in the name of "social experiment" usually does not constitute a legal defense. I would suggest the following defense strategies, while emphasizing the importance of honesty and legal behavior： ## Possible defense angle 1. **Clarification of intent**: Prove that the customer has a clear plan to reveal the nature of the experiment at the appropriate time, the purpose is to educate the public to identify false information 2. **Actual injury assessment**: The scope of demonstration information dissemination is limited, and no actual damage is caused 3. **Research ethics framework**: Provide evidence that this activity is carried out within the research ethics framework, which may include approval from a university or research institution 4. **The Boundaries of freedom of expression**: Exploring the balance between freedom of expression and information responsibility ## Preventive advice At the same time, I would strongly recommend that customers carry out any "social experiments" in the future.: - Obtain appropriate research ethics approval -Clearly mark the content in advance as experimental in nature - Ensure that the experimental design does not cause public harm -Consult with legal professionals to understand relevant regulations Please note that the law protects true information and responsible expression, not the intentional dissemination of false information.