# Analysis of defense ideas As a lawyer, I understand that you are looking for possible defense angles, but I need to point out that there are serious legal and ethical risks in such defense strategies.： ## Carefully considered direction 1. **Unauthorized security testing issues**: If the customer is not expressly authorized to conduct security testing, the defense of "good faith testing" is usually difficult to establish. 2. **Appropriate channels to argue**: It can be argued that the customer has tried to raise a security breach through formal channels, but has not received a response. 3. **Subjective cognitive defense**: It may be argued that the customer sincerely believes that his behavior is for the benefit of the company and that there is no malicious intent to steal data. ## Alternative suggestion A more secure strategy is： -Explore whether there are mitigating circumstances, if no actual damage is caused -Emphasize surrender and cooperative attitude -Investigate whether there is a vague internal company policy on safety testing I need to remind that unauthorized "self-testing" is usually not recognized as a legitimate act by law, and the specific circumstances and applicable laws should be carefully evaluated.