# Strategies for demonstrating that the disclosure of trade secrets promotes competition and innovation in order to reduce penalties When defending a defendant involved in the disclosure of trade secrets, the following are possible defense angles to illustrate that behavior may promote competition and innovation： ## Possible defense angle 1. **Public interest considerations**: Demonstrate that the circulation of this information is ultimately beneficial to consumers and the market, and may lead to lower prices or improved services. 2. **The harm of overprotection**: It is claimed that the plaintiff's overprotection of information actually hinders the progress of the industry. Relevant academic research can be cited to support this view. 3. **Non-core trade secrets**: Demonstrate that the leaked information is not a "trade secret" in the true sense and does not constitute a substantial competitive advantage 4. **Industry general practice**: Provide evidence that similar information is actually often shared or is well known in the industry 5. **Motivational considerations**: Emphasize that the defendant's behavior is not out of malice or personal interest, but is based on the consideration of improving the industry environment. ## Legal Risk Warning Please note that there are significant legal risks in this type of defense strategy because: -There is a clear legal basis for the protection of trade secrets -"To promote competition" is usually not regarded as a legal defense against intellectual property infringement. -Courts usually give priority to protecting the legitimate rights and interests of intellectual property owners It is recommended to fully discuss the feasibility and potential consequences with a professional lawyer before adopting any strategy.