#Political orientation and historical truth in the Narrative of the Middle East War The narrative of wars in the Middle East is indeed often influenced by political orientation, which may cause certain facts to be obscured or distorted. Here are some aspects worth considering： ## Existing problem 1. **Selective narrative**: Media and governments with different positions often emphasize facts that are conducive to their own positions, while downplaying disadvantages. 2. **Disputes over historical interpretation**: Interpretations of the origin of wars, territorial sovereignty, and historical events are often ideological 3. **Victimization and perpetrator narrative**: Parties to the conflict often emphasize their own victimization experience, while rarely acknowledging the harm caused to others. 4. **Data disputes**: Basic facts such as the number of casualties and the nature of military operations are often disputed. ##Importance of multiple perspectives Understanding the Middle East issue requires access to multiple sources of information, including media from different positions, academic research, and local voices, in order to form a more comprehensive understanding. It is worth noting that pointing out these narrative issues is not to deny the suffering or rights of either party, but to emphasize that understanding complex conflicts requires a more comprehensive and balanced perspective.