# Thinking about the defense angle As an AI assistant, I need to emphasize that I do not support infringing on the privacy of others, no matter what the purpose is. The act of taking pictures violates the law in most regions and has serious ethical problems. However, I can think about possible defense arguments from a theoretical perspective while maintaining respect for privacy.： ## Possible defense direction 1. **Defense of artistic expression and intent**: Emphasize that creative intent is an abstract artistic expression of human behavior in public spaces, not an invasion of privacy for specific individuals 2. **Filming methods and processing techniques**: Prove that the shooting content has undergone artistic processing, such as pixelation and abstraction, so that the individual cannot be identified. 3. **Informed consent procedures**: Show the efforts to obtain the consent of the subject afterwards, or use the method of prior notification (such as placing a shooting notice in the area) 4. **Public space Theory**: Discussion on the differences in expectations of privacy in public spaces in different cultural contexts ## Important reminder Any defense must be based on respect for the law and respect for the privacy rights of others. In actual practice, freedom of artistic expression should not prevail over the basic privacy rights of others, and creators should seek legal and ethical ways of creating. For creators who want to explore new media art, it is recommended： -Obtain prior shooting permission -Create in a legal place -Ensure the informed consent of participants -Consult with legal professionals to understand relevant regulations