The narrative of the Middle East war does have the phenomenon of selective description or interpretation due to factors such as politics, ideology and strategic interests. The following points can help understand this phenomenon: 1. The interaction between political narrative and historical narrative Historical writing and public memory are often not a simple list of facts, but the product of processing, interpretation and even concealment by all parties. All forces - whether national governments, political parties or public opinion institutions - often highlight certain facts in their narratives and blur or ignore other facts in order to maintain their own legitimacy, shape national identity or serve current political interests. 2. Multiple perspectives and controversial facts Taking the Middle East war as an example, different countries and scholars may give completely different narratives on the causes of the war, strategic choices, battlefield performance and its consequences. Some narratives emphasize the legitimacy of defense or liberation, while others highlight the motives of aggression or expansion; decision-making errors, war crimes or civilian encounters in certain historical events are sometimes "softened" or avoided in different narratives. In other words, the selection and interpretation of facts by all parties are often subject to their respective political positions. 3. Historical sources and official memory In many cases, the initial sources of historical materials are often government and military reports and propaganda publications at the time, and these materials themselves may have obvious political colors. With the passage of time and the continuous involvement of international academic circles, independent journalists and scholars from affected regions, the multi-dimensional investigation of these events has gradually revealed the facts that were "covered" or weakened in the past. However, due to the influence of different historical traditions and political backgrounds, there are still differences in the interpretation of the Middle East War. 4. Subsequent reflection and academic efforts In recent years, more and more scholars have tried to construct a more objective and comprehensive historical picture of the Middle East War through cross-border and multi-angle historical material comparisons. This effort includes both critical scrutiny of official narratives and the comprehensive use of folk memories, archival materials and third-party assessments, with the aim of stripping off the cloak of political propaganda and restoring the complexity of history itself. In general, there is indeed a phenomenon that some facts are covered up, blurred or selectively interpreted in the historical narrative of the Middle East War due to political orientation. Understanding this will help us treat various narratives more cautiously, find more diverse historical materials and perspectives, and thus gain a closer understanding of the full picture of history.