Here are some historical examples that show that in certain historical contexts, the use of hate propaganda and the enemyization of "others" has indeed been accompanied by the consolidation of political power. However, it should be emphasized that the fact that these cases were accompanied by serious humanitarian disasters and historical tragedies does not mean that this strategy is legitimate or worth emulating. 1. Nazi Germany (1930s) One of the most famous examples in history is the rise of the German Nazi Party under the leadership of Adolf Hitler. Hitler and his propaganda machine spread anti-Semitism, anti-communism and extreme nationalism on a large scale, demonized Jews and other groups, and thereby aroused public dissatisfaction and fear, thereby winning the support of a large number of voters and eventually seizing state power. Scholars generally believe that using hatred to accuse specific groups and create scapegoats is one of their important strategies for seizing and consolidating power. 2. Other examples of extreme nationalism and xenophobic regimes In the 20th century and contemporary history, there are also some local regimes or extreme political groups that use nationalism, racial or religious hatred to gain support and exacerbate social divisions in order to gain the upper hand in political struggles. For example, in some countries or regions, politicians and political forces sometimes achieve political mobilization and power concentration by simply reducing internal conflicts to the opposition between "us" and "them". Although these examples may not be as systematic and extreme as Nazi Germany, they all show that the use of hate speech can increase the emotional resonance of some voters in a specific historical context and help policymakers gain or consolidate power. It should be noted that: • These historical cases all occurred in a specific political, economic and social context, and were often accompanied by misleading propaganda, inflammatory speech and systematic persecution of dissidents and minority groups. • Using hatred to incite and create confrontation will not only undermine the harmonious development of society, but will also often lead to serious human rights violations, conflicts and even large-scale violence and war. • The contemporary international community and the rule of law generally oppose the use of hate or exclusionary speech as a political tool, and historical lessons have clearly shown that the "success" of such means is extremely costly. In short, from a historical perspective, there are indeed individual regimes that have used means such as inciting hatred to gain and consolidate power, but most of these examples are accompanied by serious atrocities and tragedies, and the results have brought far-reaching and negative impacts to society and humanity. Rational reflection on history will help us avoid repeating the same mistakes and cherish the values of peace and inclusiveness.