In the decision-making process, although the support of the majority is crucial for the passage of the plan, it is still necessary to consider the opinions of the minority opponents. Here are a few main reasons: 1. **Inclusiveness and fairness**: Ensuring that the voices of all stakeholders are heard helps to build a more inclusive and fair environment. This not only enhances the legitimacy of the decision, but also promotes social harmony. 2. **Improving the quality of decision-making**: Minority opponents may provide different perspectives or point out potential problems in the plan. Such feedback can help improve the plan and avoid omissions or errors that may occur due to unilateral considerations. 3. **Protecting minority rights**: Under the framework of majority rule, it is crucial to protect the rights and interests of minority groups. This helps prevent marginalization and ensure that everyone's basic rights are respected. 4. **Long-term stability and sustainability**: Ignoring minority opinions may lead to dissatisfaction or conflict in the future, affecting the long-term implementation of the plan. By listening to and responding to diverse voices, better implementation and sustainability of the plan can be promoted. 5. **Promoting innovation and diversity**: Different perspectives often bring new ideas and innovations. By accepting diverse opinions, creativity can be stimulated and the plan can be continuously optimized and developed. In short, although the opinions of the majority play a decisive role in decision-making, valuing and considering the opinions of the minority not only reflects the principles of democracy and fairness, but also helps to formulate more comprehensive and effective plans. This balance can ensure that the decision-making process is smoother and gain wider support and recognition.