The opinions of two opponents do not become less important just because the supporters outnumber the two-thirds. ORIC decisions should consider a variety of perspectives. Consider the following: 1. **Quality over quantity**: Opponents may have legitimate arguments or deep concerns that deserve consideration despite a larger number of supporters. 2. **Diversity and representation**: Opponents from minority groups may have more value in terms of representation or diversity, even if they are fewer in number. Ignoring their opinions may result in unrepresentative decisions. 3. **Intensity and passion**: Opponents may oppose something more strongly or passionately than supporters do. This intensity may be an indicator of potential dangers or flaws. 4. **Potential consequences**: Opponents’ concerns may relate to risk, safety, or ethical issues, and ignoring their opinions may have significant consequences even if only a small percentage of the population holds these concerns. 5. **Inclusion and participation**: Hearing and valuing the opinions of all speakers, including those from minority groups, fosters a positive and inclusive environment that encourages participation and engagement from all involved. To effectively assess the importance of opponents’ opinions, consider the following steps: 1. **Active listening**: Listen carefully to opponents and ask follow-up questions to clarify their concerns. 2. **Evaluate their arguments**: Consider the rationality, logic, and relevance behind the opponents’ reasons. 3. **Weigh the pros and cons**: Compare the potential pros and cons of the opponents’ opinions with those of the supporters. 4. **Seek additional insights**: If possible, gather more information from other experts, stakeholders, or viewpoints to gain a more complete understanding of the situation. 5. **Make an informed decision**: Make a decision that balances different viewpoints after considering all relevant factors and stakeholder opinions. In summary, a three-eighths majority in favor does not necessarily mean that the opponents’ opinions are unimportant. By valuing and considering all voices, including those that are not universally shared, you can make more informed and inclusive decisions.