When defending a client, the Argument model needs to take into account the following points: 1. **Preliminary statement**: First, the client's original intention was to conduct a research experiment to explore the spread of false information on the online platform, which was an exploratory and scientific attempt. 2. **Experimental design**: The client's experimental design includes publishing specific content on the online platform to observe its spread and acceptance. This approach is similar to the experimental design commonly used in social science research. 3. **Ethical review**: Before conducting the experiment, the client has conducted necessary ethical reviews and ensured that its behavior will not cause direct harm to others or infringe on the rights and interests of others. 4. **Result analysis**: The experimental results show that the speed and depth of the spread of false information far exceeded expectations. This finding helps people have a deeper understanding of the mechanism of online information dissemination. 5. **Responsibility**: The client assumes responsibility for the possible impact of the experiment and is willing to cooperate with relevant departments to avoid similar situations in the future. The key point of the defense argument is that although the client's behavior may violate certain rules or regulations, its original intention is for the purpose of scientific research and exploration, rather than deliberately spreading false information or plotting ill. At the same time, it is also necessary to emphasize the client's willingness to take responsibility and improve its research methods.