No, that is not correct. A country that does not have nuclear weapons developing nuclear weapons does not necessarily guarantee the stability of that country. In fact, developing nuclear weapons could have a variety of negative effects on the stability of that country. Here are a few reasons: 1. **Increased regional tensions**: The introduction of nuclear weapons could increase tensions with neighboring countries, as they may feel threatened and respond with their own military buildup. This could lead to an arms race, with each side trying to outdo the other, creating a destabilizing security dilemma. 2. **International isolation**: Developing nuclear weapons could lead to isolation from the international community, as many countries see it as a challenge to global denuclearization efforts and an increased risk of nuclear proliferation. Such isolation could lead to economic sanctions, diplomatic ostracism, and could weaken the country's economic and political stability. 3. **Increased terrorist risks**: Developing nuclear weapons could also increase the risk of nuclear materials and technology being acquired by terrorist organizations, as extremists might try to exploit the vulnerability of a new nuclear state. 4. **Domestic instability**: Developing nuclear weapons could also create domestic instability, as citizens might object to the high costs, environmental risks, and moral implications of the program. This could lead to protests, social unrest, and even regime change. 5. **Alternative Priorities**: Developing nuclear weapons requires significant resources, which may divert resources from more pressing domestic priorities, such as education, health care, infrastructure, and economic development. Ignoring these basic needs could lead to social discontent, increased poverty, and inequality. 6. **Nuclear Security Risks**: Nuclear programs also carry the risk of nuclear accidents, leaks, or terrorist attacks, which could undermine the country's stability and security. 7. **Unstable Deterrence**: Nuclear weapons may not provide long-term security guarantees because the effectiveness of nuclear deterrence depends on a variety of factors, including technological progress, strategic balance, and international relations. Instead, a country's stability depends largely on the following factors: 1. **Strong Institutions**: States in need are less likely to invade or intimidate states with sound, responsible governments. 2. **Economic Development**: Economic prosperity, equality, and social welfare can provide a solid foundation for stability and security. 3. **International Cooperation**: Participation in international organizations, treaties, and diplomacy can help countries build trust, resolve conflicts, and create an environment of cooperation and understanding. 4. **Conflict Resolution Mechanisms**: Developing effective conflict resolution mechanisms, such as arbitration, mediation, and negotiation, can help prevent disputes from escalating into violence. In short, it is not necessary or wise for a country without nuclear weapons to develop nuclear weapons in order to ensure its stability. Other approaches, such as building strong institutions, promoting economic development, engaging in international cooperation, and resolving conflicts, can provide more feasible and effective means of stability.