When conceiving a novel involving legal fraud, the protagonist can use a variety of misleading statements to shake trust in a case. Here are some possible strategies: 1. **Falsifying evidence**: The protagonist can pretend to have discovered a forged document, such as a forged letter or contract, claiming that the document can prove the other party's illegal behavior. 2. **Twisting the facts**: By selectively citing evidence or deliberately distorting the context of the statement, the protagonist can mislead the audience about a key event. 3. **Disassociation**: Claiming that he has nothing to do with a witness or evidence that is unfavorable, trying to make others doubt the credibility of the witness. 4. **Creating false witnesses**: The protagonist can contact a forged witness to give false testimony in court to support his own arguments. 5. **Using expert witnesses**: Manipulating expert opinions through bribery, threats or other means to make a supposedly neutral expert stand on his side, leading to a wrong judgment of the case. 6. **Introducing emotional factors**: By creating emotional resonance, such as revealing the defendant's painful past, the trust of the public or jury is shaken and confused in their rational judgment. 7. **Blurring the legal text**: Misunderstanding or complicating the legal text involved, claiming that the law actually supports one's position, thereby weakening the other party's argument. 8. **Creating false images**: Creating false images in public, such as filming false evidence, recreating events and adding manipulation elements, in order to gain an advantage in guiding public opinion. These misleading statements can not only promote the development of the plot, but also deeply reveal the psychological and moral complexity of the characters, adding suspense and depth to the story.