The planning and promotion of economic policies usually require many considerations, including economic theory, social psychology, and political environment. Here are some possible reasons why some economic policies can convince the public that sacrificing certain labor rights is a necessary measure to promote economic growth: 1. **Necessity of economic growth**: Propaganda often emphasizes the importance of economic growth, such as creating jobs and improving living standards. By directly linking economic growth with social welfare, the public can be made to believe that any measures that cause short-term pain (such as cutting labor rights) are for longer-term benefits. 2. **Emphasis on successful cases**: Policymakers may cite successful cases in other countries or regions, emphasizing the economic recovery and growth after sacrificing labor rights. This selective information transmission makes people more receptive to similar reforms. 3. **"Overall interests" argument**: Economic policy propaganda often emphasizes that overall interests are higher than individual rights, comparing individual short-term losses with the long-term interests of the country or society as a whole to win the understanding and support of the public. 4. **Application of economic theory**: Some economic theories, such as supply-side economics, may be used to argue that relaxing regulations on enterprises and cutting labor rights will be beneficial to enterprise investment and production, thereby further promoting economic growth. 5. **Fear and anxiety**: In times of economic uncertainty, the public’s fear of job losses and economic recession may make them more inclined to accept difficult policies. Policy propaganda may take advantage of this fear and may put forward the argument of “helpless measures” or “the price that must be paid” to gain public understanding. 6. **Lack of information and education**: The general public may not have a deep understanding of complex economic policies and lack a comprehensive understanding of the relevant impacts. In this case, it is easy to accept simple arguments and superficial results without exploring the potential consequences of policies in depth. 7. **Political and ideological influence**: Propaganda from some political groups or ideological backgrounds may shape the public’s view that free markets and economic flexibility are the top priorities for development, while sacrificing certain rights and interests is seen as an inevitable choice to adapt to globalization and competition. 8. **Lack of discussion of alternatives**: Policy propaganda often focuses on “measures that must be taken” and lacks sufficient discussion of other alternatives. This makes the public more inclined to accept existing policies when there are no other options. In short, the formulation and promotion of economic policies is a complex process involving many factors, including the interpretation of the economic situation, psychological factors, and public opinion guidance. In this kind of design and publicity, clear and powerful messaging and resonance with the public's emotions can sometimes have a significant impact.