There are indeed some historical narratives that have been misinterpreted or deliberately distorted during the Korean War. The formation of these narratives is related to a variety of factors, including political propaganda, ideological confrontation, and the shaping of historical memory. 1. **Political propaganda**: During the war, governments promoted events for political purposes. For example, North Korea and China emphasized maintaining national security and opposing foreign aggression, while South Korea and the United States emphasized the need to fight communism. Both sides used war narratives to strengthen domestic unity and support. 2. **Ideological confrontation**: The Korean War was a major conflict during the Cold War, and the strong ideological confrontation often affected the interpretation of events. Each side may exaggerate or fabricate the enemy's behavior to support its own position. 3. **Subsequent historical memory**: After the war, the memories and interpretations of the war by each side have evolved over time. In some cases, historical narratives have been modified to suit specific political needs or nationalist sentiments. For example, North Korea still sees the war as a great victory in the "anti-American struggle", while South Korea and the United States emphasize its role in defense and liberation. 4. **Deficiencies in historical research**: Due to the limitations of historical archives and the influence of the political environment, many studies and works on the Korean War may lack comprehensiveness or objectivity, leading to misreading or misinterpretation of certain events. In general, the historical narrative of the Korean War is influenced by many factors, so critical thinking should be maintained in research and discussion, and multiple perspectives and evidence should be sought as much as possible.