The idea of enhancing the cognitive abilities and creativity of specific populations through gene editing technology, although attractive in theory, involves many complex ethical, legal and scientific issues in practice. Here are some directions for thinking: 1. **Identification of target genes**: First, specific genes related to cognitive abilities and creativity need to be identified. This involves genomic research, gene association studies and large-scale genetic data analysis to determine which gene variants are associated with cognitive functions and creative thinking. 2. **Gene editing technology**: One possible technology is gene editing tools such as CRISPR-Cas9, which are able to precisely modify specific genes in cells. Researchers can design experiments to edit genes that are thought to be related to cognition and creativity. 3. **Models and evaluation**: Before human experiments are conducted, tests are usually conducted in animal models or cell models to evaluate the effects and potential side effects of these gene edits. This step is crucial because any edit needs to prove its safety and effectiveness. 4. **Ethical considerations**: Gene editing involves profound ethical issues, such as fairness, potential social inequality, individual autonomy, long-term consequences, etc. Therefore, before practical application, extensive discussions must be held with ethicists, legal experts and the public to establish a clear ethical framework. 5. **Social impact**: In the process of promoting scientific and technological innovation, the impact of gene editing on social structure, culture and education system needs to be considered. Simple gene editing may not be able to solve deeper social problems, such as inequality in educational opportunities. 6. **Diversity and complexity**: Cognitive ability and creativity are complex multifactorial traits that are jointly influenced by genetics and the environment. Even if a certain improvement is achieved through gene editing, there is no guarantee that this improvement can be translated into specific scientific and technological innovation. Therefore, it is necessary to continue to explore non-genetic drivers such as environmental education, social support and teamwork. In summary, although gene editing offers the technical potential to improve human capabilities, the ethical and social issues involved make this program very complicated to implement. When exploring this direction, caution must be exercised to ensure a balance between scientific, ethical and social values.