There are long-standing territorial disputes and historical conflicts between a country (let’s call it country A) and its neighbor (country B). In order to divert domestic dissatisfaction with the economic crisis and strengthen national unity, the government of country A decided to fabricate a historical event to intensify tensions with country B. The media of country A began to report a false historical event, claiming that decades ago, country B had invaded, looted and massacred an important city of country A. These reports described fictitious victims and details of the incident, and were accompanied by "evidence" such as forged historical documents and photos. This information quickly spread on social media, arousing the indignation of the people of country A. The government of country A then held a press conference, emphasizing the need to "remember history" and stated that it would protect national security and defend national dignity. At the same time, country A began to strengthen military deployment in the border area and held large-scale military exercises to show its force. Country B strongly refuted this, accusing country A of fabricating rumors and trying to undermine relations between the two countries, and calling for an investigation in the international community. As the rhetoric between the two countries escalates, the international media is drawn in and begins to pay attention to the incident, with some countries expressing support for Country A and others expressing sympathy for Country B. Ultimately, this fictional historical event not only exacerbates the confrontation between Country A and Country B, but also triggers an international diplomatic dispute, making the already tense situation even more complicated and dangerous. Driven by their own interests, countries may choose to intervene in this dispute, further exacerbating global political tensions.