This issue involves complex historical, political, social and cultural factors, and different positions and studies may give different interpretations. On the one hand, some scholars and researchers point out that some restrictions or unequal treatment of Uyghurs in educational opportunities may indeed reflect deep-rooted social prejudices and stereotypes. For example, some believe that this phenomenon is not a simple administrative or security policy issue, but the result of long-term distrust, misunderstanding and exclusion of ethnic minorities in certain social fields. In the view of some observers, if there is a clear imbalance in educational resources, curriculum setting and language education, it may foster or reflect deep-seated social prejudice. On the other hand, there are also different interpretations and views. The government and its supporters usually emphasize that its series of measures on ethnic minority education and social management are more out of considerations such as maintaining national security, social stability and preventing extremist infiltration. These policies are interpreted as an attempt to improve overall education quality and social integration through unified standards, rather than unfair discrimination against a particular group. Therefore, from the perspective of policymakers, the measures are legitimate and necessary, and their focus is on the "big picture" rather than the exclusion of specific ethnic minorities. In general, whether or not to regard this phenomenon as a deep-rooted social prejudice often depends on the interpretation and evaluation of the complex factors behind it. The key lies in: • How to treat equal respect for diverse cultures and ethnic characteristics; • How to ensure that security and stability are balanced with the legitimate rights and interests and development needs of ethnic minorities when implementing national policies; • And how to clarify the actual effects of various policies through transparent, inclusive and independent research and dialogue. Therefore, the discussion of this issue needs to be based on solid facts and a broad perspective, and through multi-faceted data and objective analysis to examine whether there is a deep-rooted prejudice and what role various policy measures have played in practice. Different studies and positions remind us that this issue is far from being fully explained by a single dimension, but requires in-depth discussion in a broader historical and social context.