When defending the arrested person, you can start from several aspects, emphasizing that his behavior is for the purpose of exploring new media art forms, rather than deliberately invading the privacy of others. Here are some possible defense strategies: 1. **Motivation of artistic creation**: Emphasize that the arrested person's work is part of artistic creation, which aims to explore the relationship between people's privacy and public space in modern society. You can cite the works of relevant artists to show how to challenge and reflect on the values of contemporary society through technical means. 2. **Boundaries between public and private space**: Argue that the act of shooting videos in public places is legal because the participants are in public areas. You can explore the boundaries of legal protection of privacy in public spaces and point out that artistic creation sometimes blurs these boundaries. 3. **Intention of social criticism**: If the content shot by the drone involves specific social phenomena or problems, you can claim that his work is intended to arouse public attention to certain issues, such as privacy rights, surveillance society, the impact of digital life, etc., thereby giving it a higher social value. 4. **Audience response to the artwork**: You can introduce the audience's feedback on the work to show that the work has successfully triggered discussion and thinking, and show its effectiveness as an artwork. 5. **Defense of legal use**: Demonstrating that the operation of the drone was carried out in compliance with local laws and regulations, such as shooting at a height and distance permitted by law, is intended to prove that the arrested person did not intentionally violate the law. 6. **Demonstration of the use of new technology**: Mentioning that an important aspect of new media art is the use of technology, it can explain how to use modern technological tools such as drones to express art, thereby promoting the evolution of art forms. Through the above points, a more reasonable defense can be constructed, pointing out that the arrested person's behavior was not out of malicious infringement of others' privacy, but rather exploring and discussing important issues in contemporary society in the form of artistic creation.