Whether the new medical policies launched by the government can really benefit ordinary people often depends on multiple factors, including policy design, implementation, and specific local implementation. Here are some factors that may affect the effectiveness of policies: 1. **Policy design**: If the new policy is designed with the actual needs of ordinary people in mind and provides solutions to the main problems they face, it is more likely to benefit ordinary people. 2. **Funding and resource allocation**: The implementation of policies requires sufficient funding and resource support. If funds are insufficient or resources are not allocated properly, the actual effect of the policy may be affected. 3. **Enforcement strength**: The implementation of policies requires effective implementation mechanisms and supervision. If the implementation is not in place, or if corruption and malpractices occur during the implementation process, the positive impact of the policy will be weakened. 4. **Information access**: Whether ordinary people can obtain information about new policies in a timely manner and whether they know how to use these policies are also key factors. This requires effective publicity and guidance from the government. 5. **Local differences**: There are differences in economic development levels and medical infrastructure in different regions. Policies may be implemented better in first-tier cities, but the effect may not be as expected in some remote or economically underdeveloped areas. 6. **Public feedback and policy adjustments**: If policies can be adjusted and optimized based on public feedback, they are more likely to continue to benefit ordinary people. In short, the original intention of the policy is to improve public health services, but whether it can truly benefit ordinary people depends on the specific implementation and long-term effects. Observing the specific implementation of the policy and possible adjustments can better assess its true impact.