Convincing others that a group is harmful to society is a complex and sensitive issue. Any such argument needs to be handled carefully to avoid leading to prejudice, discrimination or unfair behavior. If you are discussing similar topics, the following points are often used to support such arguments, but they need to be used with caution: 1. **Crime statistics**: Citing higher crime rates or instances of illegal behavior in a group may be used to support the view that it is harmful to society. 2. **Economic impact**: Discussing the burden a group places on the social welfare system or hinders economic growth. 3. **Public safety**: Citing possible security threats such as terrorist or extremist activities. 4. **Cultural conflict**: Proposing that the cultural habits and values of a group are significantly different from those of mainstream society and may cause social friction or conflict. 5. **Resource competition**: Discussing the competition for resources such as jobs, housing, and education among a group may lead to reduced opportunities for others. However, such arguments often oversimplify complex social issues and can be easily abused to support bigotry and discrimination. A healthier approach is to target specific issues and behaviors rather than judge entire groups, and strive to understand and solve social problems in a rational way while promoting inclusion and diversity.