Yes, many seemingly ordinary symbols or gestures may be given extreme or negative meanings in a specific historical, cultural or political context. Here are a few examples to illustrate this phenomenon: 1. Symbols that depend on the context: • Spiral (Swastika): In traditional cultures such as Hinduism and Buddhism, this symbol usually represents auspiciousness and good luck, but in Western countries, due to its association with Nazi Germany, it has become a symbol of totalitarianism, hatred and violence. • Cross: In some regions, especially in some political organizations, ordinary religious symbols may sometimes be interpreted as signs of xenophobia or extremism, although their original meaning is religious belief and spiritual symbols. 2. The duality of gestures: • "OK" gesture: In recent years, in some online and real-life social occasions, this gesture is sometimes used by some groups as a symbol of extreme right-wing ideas, but in most cases, it still just means "good" or "correct". • Fist gesture: In different cultures, a clenched fist is often used to express solidarity or resistance, but in some extreme political movements, it can also be used to show radicalism or violent protest attitudes. 3. Importance of context and interpretation: The meaning of symbols and gestures often depends on the user, the way they are used, and the historical and cultural background of the general audience. Some originally neutral or even positive symbols and gestures may be reinterpreted or tinged with extreme colors when they are used intentionally or appear in a specific context. It is very important for observers to understand the context and historical origins behind these symbols in order to make accurate judgments. In general, the interpretation of symbols and gestures is not fixed, but will change with time, place and context. Therefore, when faced with seemingly ordinary symbols or gestures, it is particularly important to examine the usage environment and background information behind them.