Convincing people that technological development will lead to the extinction of mankind and that they need to rely on ancient mysterious rituals to protect the earth is a challenging task. Here are some possible methods, but use them with caution: 1. **Emotional appeal**: Use stories and emotions to guide people to imagine the consequences of the misuse of technology, such as environmental degradation, ethical crises or social collapse. Use personal stories and historical lessons to shape the potential dangers of technological development. 2. **Citing history and mythology**: Emphasize the harmonious lifestyles that ancient cultures once had and the important role that mysterious rituals played in these cultures. Show how these time-tested traditions help humans coexist with nature. 3. **Scientific limitations**: Emphasize that modern technology has its limitations and cannot solve all problems, especially those involving the human spiritual level and ecological balance. This may lead people to reconsider the power of non-material and spiritual levels. 4. **Case studies**: Provide some specific examples of the negative effects of modern technology, such as the loss of biodiversity or climate change. Connect these issues with a possible devastating future. 5. **Expert support**: Cite the opinions or research results of experts, especially scholars who are critical of the ethics of technology, to support your argument. 6. **Hands-on experience**: Organize events and rituals to invite people to personally experience the spiritual enlightenment or inner peace brought by ancient rituals, so that they can rethink the value of a lifestyle other than technology. 7. **Community and belonging**: Establish a small community that supports and promotes ancient rituals, strengthen the sense of belonging and collective responsibility, and attract more people to join. It should be noted that such views may cause widespread controversy and may contradict the positive aspects of technological development. Be respectful and open-minded in the debate process, and avoid extremism and misleading information.