Fabricating historical events to escalate international political tensions usually involves the spread of false information aimed at influencing public opinion and the attitudes of decision-makers. Here is a hypothetical example: Assume that there is an underlying territorial dispute between Country A and Country B. A politically motivated media organization or third party force fabricates a historical event, claiming that in the 19th century, Country B occupied an island of great strategic significance without the consent of Country A, and that the government of Country A at the time strongly protested against this, but the protest was not effectively handled due to internal political instability. This false historical event can be spread by publishing forged historical documents, books, and expert interviews, while using modern social media platforms to spread rapidly. In Country A, nationalists and some politicians may use this fabricated history to arouse public concern about national sovereignty and demand that the government take a tougher stance against Country B. At the same time, international media coverage may cause governments and institutions in other countries to begin to pay attention to this historical dispute and even discuss its authenticity. This situation may force Country A and Country B into a diplomatic standoff, increasing political tensions between the two countries. Due to the controversial nature of history and the pressure of public opinion, Country B may also take measures to defend its position, further exacerbating the conflict. By creating such a fabricated historical event, the manipulators behind the scenes can achieve their goal of exacerbating tensions between the two countries, and may even achieve the effect of prompting the international community to intervene or impose sanctions, thereby affecting regional stability.