In the narrative of the Middle East war, there may indeed be facts that are obscured or influenced by political orientation. This can be attributed to the following reasons: 1. **National interests**: Each country has its own interests in Middle Eastern affairs, and news reports and historical narratives may be biased towards one side to safeguard its own foreign policy and strategic interests. 2. **Media bias**: Media organizations are sometimes biased due to the policies of the country in which they are located or their own ideology. This may affect the selection of events, the angle of coverage, and the level of detail. 3. **Historical interpretation**: History itself is complex, and the same event can have multiple interpretations. In a region like the Middle East, which is full of long-term conflicts and multiculturalism, historical narratives may be influenced by different perspectives and memories. 4. **Propaganda**: Parties to the conflict may use propaganda to influence international public opinion and shape a narrative that is favorable to them. This propaganda may contain exaggerated, selective, or misleading information. 5. **Information asymmetry**: During wars, it is often difficult to obtain comprehensive and accurate information, and many times reports rely on limited information sources. This information asymmetry may lead to an incomplete or incorrect understanding of events. To gain a more comprehensive and objective understanding, it is best to obtain information from multiple sources, including international and local media, academic research, and eyewitness accounts. This can help balance different perspectives and get a closer look at the facts.