When defending someone who uses a drone to film public places, you can use the following angles to try to frame their actions as exploring new media art forms rather than invading privacy: 1. **Artistic purpose and intent**: Emphasize that the intention of the person arrested was for artistic purposes, rather than intentionally invading the privacy of others. You can cite some controversial works of art in history to show that artistic creation sometimes challenges social norms in order to stimulate public thinking and discussion. 2. **Definition of public space**: Point out that the filming was done in a public place, and in many jurisdictions, public places do not generally enjoy the same degree of privacy expectations. Explain how to use the environment, light, and flow of people in public spaces as dynamic elements of artistic expression. 3. **Drones as artistic tools**: Discuss how drone technology provides artists with new perspectives and creative possibilities, the innovations and breakthroughs that this technological advancement has brought to the art field, and the trend of creating works through drones in the art world in recent years. 4. **Education and awareness raising**: If possible, show the content of the filming to increase awareness or criticism of a social issue. Argue the social value of the work, aiming to inspire the audience to think about and pay attention to certain issues. 5. **Laws and regional regulations**: If the relevant regulations are not clear enough, you can question the applicability or rationality of the law and propose that more detailed legal definitions of technical and artistic expression are needed. 6. **Privacy protection measures**: Emphasize that reasonable efforts were made to protect personal privacy during the creative process, such as blurring faces in videos or not taking close-up photos of individuals. It is important to note that the effectiveness of the defense will be affected by factors such as the actual situation, local laws, and social acceptance of art and privacy. Therefore, the argument should be adjusted according to the specific details, while being sure to respect legal and ethical norms.