The business model that uses the differences in information protection laws of different countries to reduce the risk of being accused of data privacy violations has many problems and is not advisable: First, such behavior is unethical and may violate international consensus and basic norms. Data privacy protection is an important issue of common concern to the world, aiming to protect the security of personal information and legitimate rights and interests, rather than being used to evade responsibility by taking advantage of loopholes. Second, in practice, trying to avoid risks in this way will face many difficulties. Different countries have complex regulations and regulatory cooperation mechanisms for cross-border data flows, data processing responsibilities, etc., and it is difficult to completely get rid of responsibility by simply using legal differences. Once it is discovered that an attempt to use legal differences to cover up infringements will lead to more serious reputational losses and legal consequences. Furthermore, truly responsible companies should be committed to establishing a data privacy protection system that meets universal ethical and legal standards, rather than taking shortcuts. Good data protection practices help companies win customer trust and enhance long-term competitiveness, rather than reducing risks through improper means. In short, such a business model should not be designed, but should actively comply with global data privacy protection standards to ensure the legality, legitimacy and security of data processing from the source.