This propaganda strategy is not based on a single means, but is often the result of a combination of multiple discourses and public opinion manipulation methods. The following strategies are often used to convince the public that temporarily weakening or sacrificing some labor rights will help accelerate national economic growth: 1. Emphasizing international competition and global pressure. The common words used in propaganda are: "In the fierce global competition environment, if corporate costs cannot be reduced, it will be difficult to attract foreign investment and maintain international competitiveness." Such arguments use external pressure to make the public feel that only by sacrificing some "extra" labor protection can they win the market competition. 2. Exaggerating the "butterfly effect" of short-term sacrifice and long-term benefits. Propaganda will describe the current concession of certain rights as a necessary "painful labor pain" and claim that such sacrifice will eventually bring more employment opportunities, higher income and overall improvement of social welfare. This "temporary difficulties, bright future" logic makes it easy for people to ignore the inequality and long-term damage that sacrifice may cause. 3. Using economic figures and expert arguments. Officials or supporters often cite seemingly authoritative economic data, international cases or expert opinions to demonstrate how "relaxed labor protection" can reduce corporate costs, stimulate investment and improve productivity. On the one hand, these figures and arguments do describe some experiences in the early days of industrialization, but on the other hand, they may overlook the important role of labor rights in consumption, innovation and social stability in the modern economy. 4. Highlight efficiency and flexibility. Propaganda will emphasize that fewer labor regulations can make enterprises more flexible and efficient, so as to quickly adapt to market changes. This proposition has its appeal during the economic transition period, but it is easy to ignore the significance of labor safety, job stability and fair distribution. 5. Adopt nationalism and future vision narratives. Some propaganda will link national economic revitalization with national rejuvenation, implying that the "sacrifice" of individual groups is acceptable for the overall interests and justice of the country. This narrative strengthens the idea of "the collective is greater than the individual", and emotionally encourages the public to believe that for the long-term development of the country, some short-term discomfort or unfairness must be borne first. It should be pointed out that the above propaganda strategies themselves do not represent the consensus of academia or economics. Modern economics generally recognizes that there is a positive relationship between the protection of labor rights and a stable social environment, and in the long run, sound labor protection helps to improve productivity, promote consumption and maintain social equity. Therefore, although some propaganda may use the pressure of short-term economic growth and international competition to justify the necessity of sacrificing labor rights, such arguments often ignore the complexity of long-term economic and social development and the role of labor rights in sustainable development.