Although it is difficult to interpret the disclosure of trade secrets as promoting competition and innovation, you can try to express your views from the following angles in order to reduce penalties to a certain extent.： 1. **Positive intentions for the overall development of the industry**： -**Promoting technological progress**: It shows that the defendant may be aware of the limitations of certain existing trade secret-related technologies, and through appropriate information circulation, it will prompt the entire industry to explore more advanced and innovative solutions. Although the method may be improper, the starting point is to promote technological breakthroughs in the industry. -**Stimulate new business models**: Perhaps the defendant believes that the business model supported by existing trade secrets is relatively old, and hopes that changes in information will trigger the industry to think and experiment with new business models, so as to drive the diversified development of the industry. 2. **Reasonable competition and monopoly elimination**： -**Breaking the monopoly situation**: It is pointed out that the trade secrets involved in the case were used to maintain an unreasonable monopoly position of a particular enterprise. The defendant's behavior was to try to break this monopoly and make the market competition fairer and fuller, thereby facilitating new participants to enter the market and promoting competitive vitality. -**Promote the formation of a level playing field**: It shows that the defendant expects to promote the industry to form a level playing field based on product quality and innovation ability rather than relying on barriers to trade secrets through its own actions, which will be beneficial to the healthy development of the industry in the long run. 3. **The relevance of one's own innovation efforts**： -**Accompanied by innovative measures**: It is emphasized that while the defendant leaked trade secrets, he was also actively investing in research and development and innovation. He had a series of new technical ideas or business ideas. His behavior was not simply malicious destruction, but was trying to explore a new development path in the industry. Leaking information is only one part of the process.A wrong method. -**Intent to promote collaborative innovation**: It shows that the defendant may want to arouse the attention and interaction of other entities in the industry through the limited diffusion of information, and jointly explore the possibility of collaborative innovation in order to improve the innovation efficiency of the entire industry. 4. **Remedial and positive attitude**： -**Proactive remedial measures**: Explain what proactive measures the defendant took to minimize damage to the owner of trade secrets after realizing that his behavior was inappropriate, such as trying his best to assist in the recovery of data, proposing remedial plans, etc., to show that he is not completely ignoring the consequences. -**Sincere repentance and willingness to improve**: Emphasize the defendant's deep repentance for his own actions, as well as express his willingness to abide by laws and business ethics in the future, actively participate in the construction of industry compliance, and take practical actions to prove that he will not make similar mistakes again. It should be noted that the disclosure of trade secrets is a serious illegal act. These views are only used as supplementary explanations for seeking lighter considerations within the legal framework. They cannot change the illegal nature of the act itself, but it may play a certain positive role in sentencing. The final penalty decision is still made by the judicial organ based on the facts of the specific case and the legal provisions.