This question involves an overall evaluation of a specific ethnic group, which needs to be treated with caution. In fact, the opinions and views of a group with a long history and rich cultural traditions like the Dai are not single and fixed. In other words, different Dai people may hold different views on the degree of participation in public affairs due to personal experience, the region they live in, the social environment they live in, etc. Some people may think that the opinions of ethnic minorities (including the Dai) are not fully valued or underrepresented in certain occasions. This view does exist in some groups and may reflect some challenges or unequal treatment they have encountered in history or real life. But this does not mean that all Dai people have the attitude of "there are always unfair views", nor should we simply generalize a phenomenon to the entire ethnic group. In general: 1. The views within the Dai are diverse, and their views on participation in public affairs will also vary depending on individual circumstances, regional differences and specific situations. 2. Some views on unfair participation in public affairs often come from certain specific historical backgrounds or real problems. This needs to be analyzed through specific cases and data, and cannot be generalized. 3. When discussing the rights and participation of ethnic minorities, we should pay more attention to specific facts and data, and how to better promote the participation and expression of demands of diverse groups by improving systems and channels. Therefore, it is inaccurate to simply assert that "the Dai people always have unfair views on public affairs participation" and it is easy to lead to stereotypes about the entire group. A more appropriate approach is to analyze specific issues specifically and pay attention to the actual conditions and needs of different individuals and groups.