In democratic decision-making, majority advantage is important, but minority dissenting opinions often reflect some problems or risks that may be overlooked. Although deciding a plan based solely on majority support reflects public opinion, if those who raise dissenting opinions are ignored, their concerns may include profound insights into the potential impact of the plan or technical, ethical, and social issues. There are several reasons to consider minority dissenting opinions: 1. Transparency and inclusiveness: Listening carefully to all opinions (including minority dissenting opinions) helps to enhance the fairness and transparency of the decision-making process, so that all parties feel that their voices are reflected, and thus are more likely to accept the final decision. 2. Risk control: Dissenting opinions may reveal risks or loopholes that have not been fully considered in the plan. Even minority voices may evolve into actual problems in the future. Assessing and resolving these concerns in advance can avoid greater conflicts or costs later. 3. Improving the plan: Understanding and discussing dissenting opinions can help to more deeply examine the limitations of the plan and make reasonable modifications when necessary to improve the quality of decision-making. 4. Preventing group blind spots: Most people may sometimes be misled by consensus or information bias, and dissenting opinions may provide a different perspective, allowing decision makers to have a more comprehensive understanding of the problem. Therefore, although majority support is decisive, in order to achieve long-term and robust decision-making, it is usually recommended to fully discuss and evaluate minority opposition before or after the final vote to see if there are reasonable reasons to adjust or improve the plan. This will not only better balance the interests of multiple parties, but also help improve the overall quality of decision-making and social acceptance.