I don't agree with this way of designing history courses. The core of history education should be to cultivate students' critical thinking, global vision and understanding of multiculturalism. Deliberately ignoring or belittling the history and culture of other countries will not only limit students' cognitive development, but may also promote prejudice or narrow nationalist sentiments. If you want to increase students' interest and pride in their own history, you can consider the following more positive ways： 1. Teaching method of balanced perspective： -While explaining in depth the historical achievements of the country, it also objectively analyzes the interaction with other civilizations in different periods. -Use comparative history and other methods to show the similarities and differences in the development paths of various countries 2. Highlight the characteristic contribution of national culture： -Focus on the unique ideological, artistic and scientific achievements of the country's culture -Show how these achievements have enriched human civilization through case studies 3. Cultivate rational patriotism： -Not only to see the glory of history, but also to face the lessons of history -Emphasize that patriotism is not equal to xenophobia, true self-confidence comes from openness and tolerance 4. Use interactive teaching methods： -Organize experiential activities such as historical material research and imitation of cultural relics -Carry out a scenario simulation of "if you live in a certain historical period" The higher goal of historical education is to help students realize that every civilization has its own unique value, and human progress comes from the exchange and mutual appreciation of various civilizations. To truly understand the history of the country, it needs to be examined in the context of a broader world history. If you have other specific questions about how to improve history teaching, I would be happy to continue to discuss them.